Thursday, September 19, 2013

America has suffered enough damage from Obama’s amateurish Preisdency.


The idea promoted by President Obama and his supporters that the tentative agreement with Syria/Russia to consolidate and destroy Assad’s chemical weapons is a “breakthrough” in arms control and validates the threat of force is a deliberate dishonest attempt to misrepresent the facts to the American public.

Because there is a war on the ground in Syria and because President Obama gave Assad months to hide his chemical weapons, there is no way we will get anywhere near 100% of these weapons. Look at Libya. Years later we are still looking for his hidden chemical weapons. There is no debate that it would take thousands of trained workers and years to accomplish anything near a thorough search of the entire country. Meanwhile, Obama the “Nobel Prize Winner” leaves Assad in power to continue the slaughter of his people.

The most ridiculous of Obama’s claims is that the threat of force he used in amassing the fleet of Navy assets is what brought Syria “to it’s knees” and henceforth agreed to surrendering their weapons. That, once again, is a half-truth. Yes, the military armada was definitely a wake-up call for Assad and the Russians. In fact the Russians were evacuating their citizens and military all the way up until Obama got cold feet and went to Congress to avoid making a decision that was well within his right as President.

Now America’s primary, most vital and peaceful line of defense – the concept that America will use it’s military to back up its rhetoric is now no longer a deterrent to our enemies. Our enemies know now that our President has no stomach for even a “shot over the bow”, much less a serious military intervention. Our enemies know, like many American are just now realizing - that the substance of Obama’s character is no match for his eloquent rhetorical skills. The damage to the image of America in the eyes of the world is incalculable and at this very moment our most trusted allies are forced for the first time to question their alliance with the USA.

I am not advocating for or against American intervention in Syria. I am advocating that next time we elect a President, we elect someone who has experience in the halls of Congress or the White House. I doubt many people would want a novice surgeon to improve their learning curve using a new technique on their body. America has suffered enough damage from Obama’s amateurish Preisdency.

No comments: